{"id":4320,"date":"1989-03-06T09:37:49","date_gmt":"1989-03-06T08:37:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4320"},"modified":"2016-08-12T09:41:32","modified_gmt":"2016-08-12T08:41:32","slug":"sentence-724","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1989\/03\/06\/sentence-724\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 724"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 724 &#8211; Synacomex, mouille par pluie, protection insuffisante cargaison, bl\u00e9 en vrac, prescription de six mois, apparaux du navire, fermeture des panneaux, gestion commerciale navire. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex. Mouille par pluie au chargement. Protection insuffisante de la cargaison. Suspension des staries (oui). Demande reconventionnelle de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur. Frais expos\u00e9s pour la conservation de la cargaison. Prescription de six mois inopposable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 724 &#8211; Synacomex, mouille par pluie, protection insuffisante cargaison, bl\u00e9 en vrac, prescription de six mois, apparaux du navire, fermeture des panneaux, gestion commerciale navire. C\/P Synacomex. Mouille par pluie au chargement. Protection insuffisante de la cargaison. Suspension des staries (oui). Demande reconventionnelle de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur. Frais expos\u00e9s pour la conservation de la cargaison. Prescription<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4320"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4321,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4320\/revisions\/4321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}