{"id":4351,"date":"1989-01-21T09:49:48","date_gmt":"1989-01-21T08:49:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4351"},"modified":"2016-08-16T09:52:29","modified_gmt":"2016-08-16T08:52:29","slug":"sentence-714","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1989\/01\/21\/sentence-714\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 714"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 714 &#8211; Gencon, d\u00e9rogation de pavillon, incomp\u00e9tence CAMP, chartes-parties adoss\u00e9es, surestaries. <\/strong>Gencon. Transport entre l&rsquo;Alg\u00e9rie et la France. D\u00e9rogation de pavillon. Chartes-parties adoss\u00e9s. Demande en paiement de surestaries. Exception d&rsquo;incomp\u00e9tence de la C.A.M.P. &#8211; Rejet.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 714 &#8211; Gencon, d\u00e9rogation de pavillon, incomp\u00e9tence CAMP, chartes-parties adoss\u00e9es, surestaries. Gencon. Transport entre l&rsquo;Alg\u00e9rie et la France. D\u00e9rogation de pavillon. Chartes-parties adoss\u00e9s. Demande en paiement de surestaries. Exception d&rsquo;incomp\u00e9tence de la C.A.M.P. &#8211; Rejet. &nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4351","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4351","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4351"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4351\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4352,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4351\/revisions\/4352"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4351"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4351"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4351"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}