{"id":4399,"date":"1988-06-20T13:29:58","date_gmt":"1988-06-20T12:29:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4399"},"modified":"2016-08-16T13:31:04","modified_gmt":"2016-08-16T12:31:04","slug":"sentence-698","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1988\/06\/20\/sentence-698\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 698"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 698 &#8211; Synacomex, ajout dactylographi\u00e9, Centrocon Arbitraiton clause, incomp\u00e9tence CAMP, parole du courtier unique. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex amend\u00e9e. Ligne 89 de l&rsquo;imprim\u00e9. Ajout dactylographi\u00e9 disant \u00ab\u00a0as well as the voyage charter clause Paramount 1958 and the Centrocon Arbitration clause\u00a0\u00bb. Incomp\u00e9tence de la CAMP.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 698 &#8211; Synacomex, ajout dactylographi\u00e9, Centrocon Arbitraiton clause, incomp\u00e9tence CAMP, parole du courtier unique. C\/P Synacomex amend\u00e9e. Ligne 89 de l&rsquo;imprim\u00e9. Ajout dactylographi\u00e9 disant \u00ab\u00a0as well as the voyage charter clause Paramount 1958 and the Centrocon Arbitration clause\u00a0\u00bb. Incomp\u00e9tence de la CAMP.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4399"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4400,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4399\/revisions\/4400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}