{"id":4463,"date":"1987-11-20T09:39:43","date_gmt":"1987-11-20T08:39:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4463"},"modified":"2016-08-17T09:40:12","modified_gmt":"2016-08-17T08:40:12","slug":"sentence-678","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1987\/11\/20\/sentence-678\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 678"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 678 &#8211; Gencon, subrogation assureurs, viande congel\u00e9e en cartons, manquants, armateur responsable du nombre connaissement\u00e9, connaissement net. <\/strong>C\/P Gencon &#8211; Cargaison de viande congel\u00e9e log\u00e9e en cartons \u2013 Clause additionnelle rendant l&rsquo;armateur responsable du nombre de cartons figurant au connaissement &#8211; Manquants constat\u00e9s &#8211; Action subrogatoire des assureurs-facult\u00e9s.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 678 &#8211; Gencon, subrogation assureurs, viande congel\u00e9e en cartons, manquants, armateur responsable du nombre connaissement\u00e9, connaissement net. C\/P Gencon &#8211; Cargaison de viande congel\u00e9e log\u00e9e en cartons \u2013 Clause additionnelle rendant l&rsquo;armateur responsable du nombre de cartons figurant au connaissement &#8211; Manquants constat\u00e9s &#8211; Action subrogatoire des assureurs-facult\u00e9s.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4463"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4463\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4464,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4463\/revisions\/4464"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}