{"id":4540,"date":"1987-04-08T14:21:26","date_gmt":"1987-04-08T13:21:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4540"},"modified":"2016-08-17T14:22:09","modified_gmt":"2016-08-17T13:22:09","slug":"sentence-653","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1987\/04\/08\/sentence-653\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 653"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 653 &#8211; Synacomex, transport FIOS, orge en sacs, manquants \u00e0 la livraison, action du tiers porteur du connaissement, courte prescription inapplicable, clause de comp\u00e9tence applicable, pr\u00e9somption de livraison conforme, validit\u00e9 de la saisine, preuve des manquants. <\/strong>Charte-partie Synacomex. Transport FIO Stowed d&rsquo;une cargaison d&rsquo;orge en sacs destin\u00e9e \u00e0 un port d&rsquo;Arabie Saoudite. Manquants \u00e0 la livraison. Action du tiers porteur du connaissement. Validit\u00e9 de la saisine de la Chambre (oui). Courte prescription pr\u00e9vue par la charte inapplicable. R\u00e9alit\u00e9 des manquants non \u00e9tablis de fa\u00e7on contradictoire. Cette sentence n&rsquo;est pas archiv\u00e9e.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 653 &#8211; Synacomex, transport FIOS, orge en sacs, manquants \u00e0 la livraison, action du tiers porteur du connaissement, courte prescription inapplicable, clause de comp\u00e9tence applicable, pr\u00e9somption de livraison conforme, validit\u00e9 de la saisine, preuve des manquants. Charte-partie Synacomex. Transport FIO Stowed d&rsquo;une cargaison d&rsquo;orge en sacs destin\u00e9e \u00e0 un port d&rsquo;Arabie Saoudite. Manquants \u00e0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4540"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4540\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4541,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4540\/revisions\/4541"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}