{"id":4549,"date":"1987-05-30T14:29:13","date_gmt":"1987-05-30T13:29:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4549"},"modified":"2016-08-17T14:29:45","modified_gmt":"2016-08-17T13:29:45","slug":"sentence-650","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1987\/05\/30\/sentence-650\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 650"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 650 &#8211; Gencon, soufre vrac, exc\u00e8s d&rsquo;humidit\u00e9, d\u00e9chargement partiel, surestaries au d\u00e9chargement, lien clause, frais d&rsquo;attente , frais de r\u00e9exp\u00e9dition, sans pr\u00e9sentation du connaissement, prix de vente obtenu par le fr\u00e9teur de la partie de cargaison refus\u00e9e, mauvais \u00e9tat marchandise, d\u00e9tention, minimiser les dommages, non pr\u00e9sentation des connaissements &#8211; Refus de d\u00e9charger. <\/strong>R\u00e9sum\u00e9 Charte-partie Gencon. Soufre en vrac. Avaries par exc\u00e8s d&rsquo;humidit\u00e9. D\u00e9chargement partiel. R\u00e9ceptionnaire alg\u00e9rien. Non-paiement du tonnage laiss\u00e9 \u00e0 bord. R\u00e9exp\u00e9dition sur Rotterdam. Vente pour un prix forfaitaire. (1) Cons\u00e9quences financi\u00e8res. Imputation. (2) Surestaries au d\u00e9chargement. \u00ab\u00a0Lien clause\u00a0\u00bb. Effets en l&rsquo;esp\u00e8ce. (3) Frais d&rsquo;attente du navire au port destinataire. Imputation. (4) Frais de r\u00e9exp\u00e9dition d&rsquo;Annaba sur Rotterdam. Imputation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 650 &#8211; Gencon, soufre vrac, exc\u00e8s d&rsquo;humidit\u00e9, d\u00e9chargement partiel, surestaries au d\u00e9chargement, lien clause, frais d&rsquo;attente , frais de r\u00e9exp\u00e9dition, sans pr\u00e9sentation du connaissement, prix de vente obtenu par le fr\u00e9teur de la partie de cargaison refus\u00e9e, mauvais \u00e9tat marchandise, d\u00e9tention, minimiser les dommages, non pr\u00e9sentation des connaissements &#8211; Refus de d\u00e9charger. R\u00e9sum\u00e9 Charte-partie<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4549"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4550,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4549\/revisions\/4550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}