{"id":4645,"date":"1986-04-28T12:32:55","date_gmt":"1986-04-28T11:32:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4645"},"modified":"2016-08-18T12:51:08","modified_gmt":"2016-08-18T11:51:08","slug":"sentence-619","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1986\/04\/28\/sentence-619\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 619"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 619 – Gencon – D\u00e9fendeurs d\u00e9faillants – surestaries – manquants – compensation – <\/strong>C\/P Gencon – Apurement des comptes entre les parties – D\u00e9compte du montant net des surestaries revenant \u00e0 l’armateur – Rejet de la pr\u00e9tention de l’affr\u00e9teur \u00e0 compenser sa dette de surestaries avec des manquants \u00e0 destination dont la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 n’\u00e9tait pas \u00e9tablie. Pacific Dissolution du Coll\u00e8ge – D\u00e9fendeurs d\u00e9faillants.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 619 – Gencon – D\u00e9fendeurs d\u00e9faillants – surestaries – manquants – compensation – C\/P Gencon – Apurement des comptes entre les parties – D\u00e9compte du montant net des surestaries revenant \u00e0 l’armateur – Rejet de la pr\u00e9tention de l’affr\u00e9teur \u00e0 compenser sa dette de surestaries avec des manquants \u00e0 destination dont la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 n’\u00e9tait<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4645"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4645\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4646,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4645\/revisions\/4646"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}