{"id":4684,"date":"1986-02-12T13:26:50","date_gmt":"1986-02-12T12:26:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4684"},"modified":"2016-08-18T13:27:27","modified_gmt":"2016-08-18T12:27:27","slug":"sentence-607","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1986\/02\/12\/sentence-607\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 607"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 607 – Synacomex – riz en sacs – \u00e9chouement – voie d’eau – avaries communes – port de relache – abandon du voyage – demande reconventionnelle \u2013 dol non prouv\u00e9. <\/strong>(I) Demande reconventionnelle – Prescription en vertu du R\u00e8glement de la Chambre – All\u00e9gation d’un dol faisant \u00e9chec \u00e0 celle-ci – Preuve non \u00e9tablie.\u00a0(II) Fret acquis \u00e0 tout \u00e9v\u00e9nement – Application en l’absence d’une faute personnelle de l’armateur. (III) Changement de destination demand\u00e9 par l’affr\u00e9teur – Demande par l’armateur du paiement pr\u00e9alable des surestaries au chargement \u2013 Absence d’abus de droit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 607 – Synacomex – riz en sacs – \u00e9chouement – voie d’eau – avaries communes – port de relache – abandon du voyage – demande reconventionnelle \u2013 dol non prouv\u00e9. (I) Demande reconventionnelle – Prescription en vertu du R\u00e8glement de la Chambre – All\u00e9gation d’un dol faisant \u00e9chec \u00e0 celle-ci – Preuve non \u00e9tablie.\u00a0(II)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4684","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4684","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4684"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4684\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4685,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4684\/revisions\/4685"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4684"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4684"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4684"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}