{"id":4770,"date":"1985-05-10T11:22:02","date_gmt":"1985-05-10T10:22:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4770"},"modified":"2016-08-19T11:22:59","modified_gmt":"2016-08-19T10:22:59","slug":"sentence-579-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1985\/05\/10\/sentence-579-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 579"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 579 – Synacomex – fret forfaitaire – poids embarqu\u00e9 – manquants \u2013 affr\u00e9teur subrog\u00e9 de droit – freinte de route. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex – Fret forfaitaire – Dix pour cent plus ou moins \u00e0 l’option de l’affr\u00e9teur – Manquant \u00e0 la livraison – Recevabilit\u00e9 de l’action de l’affr\u00e9teur – Rajustement du fret en fonction du poids charg\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 579 – Synacomex – fret forfaitaire – poids embarqu\u00e9 – manquants \u2013 affr\u00e9teur subrog\u00e9 de droit – freinte de route. C\/P Synacomex – Fret forfaitaire – Dix pour cent plus ou moins \u00e0 l’option de l’affr\u00e9teur – Manquant \u00e0 la livraison – Recevabilit\u00e9 de l’action de l’affr\u00e9teur – Rajustement du fret en fonction du<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4770","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4770"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4770\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4771,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4770\/revisions\/4771"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}