{"id":4776,"date":"1985-06-10T09:12:09","date_gmt":"1985-06-10T08:12:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4776"},"modified":"2016-08-23T09:12:42","modified_gmt":"2016-08-23T08:12:42","slug":"sentence-577","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1985\/06\/10\/sentence-577\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 577"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 577 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; connaissements sans r\u00e9serve &#8211; lettre de garantie &#8211; avaries &#8211; qualit\u00e9 pour agir &#8211; tiers porteur de bonne foi &#8211; loi applicable &#8211; fraude &#8211; prescription trentenaire. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex &#8211; Connaissement \u00e9mis sans r\u00e9serve contre lettre de garantie du chargeur &#8211; Fraude caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e -Prescription trentenaire &#8211; R\u00e9paration due.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 577 &#8211; Synacomex &#8211; connaissements sans r\u00e9serve &#8211; lettre de garantie &#8211; avaries &#8211; qualit\u00e9 pour agir &#8211; tiers porteur de bonne foi &#8211; loi applicable &#8211; fraude &#8211; prescription trentenaire. C\/P Synacomex &#8211; Connaissement \u00e9mis sans r\u00e9serve contre lettre de garantie du chargeur &#8211; Fraude caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e -Prescription trentenaire &#8211; R\u00e9paration due.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4776","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4776","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4776"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4776\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4777,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4776\/revisions\/4777"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4776"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4776"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}