{"id":4868,"date":"1984-09-17T14:09:27","date_gmt":"1984-09-17T13:09:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4868"},"modified":"2016-08-23T14:12:21","modified_gmt":"2016-08-23T13:12:21","slug":"sentence-549","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1984\/09\/17\/sentence-549\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 549"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 549 &#8211; Gencon, clause FIOS &#8211; co\u00fbt de manutention \u00e0 charge affr\u00e9teurs. <\/strong>C\/P Gencon &#8211; Clause FIOS &#8211; Diff\u00e9rend sur l&rsquo;imputation de d\u00e9penses factur\u00e9es \u00e0 Alger, li\u00e9es \u00e0 la manutention de la cargaison, \u00e0 son magasinage ou \u00e0 sa surveillance apr\u00e8s d\u00e9chargement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 549 &#8211; Gencon, clause FIOS &#8211; co\u00fbt de manutention \u00e0 charge affr\u00e9teurs. C\/P Gencon &#8211; Clause FIOS &#8211; Diff\u00e9rend sur l&rsquo;imputation de d\u00e9penses factur\u00e9es \u00e0 Alger, li\u00e9es \u00e0 la manutention de la cargaison, \u00e0 son magasinage ou \u00e0 sa surveillance apr\u00e8s d\u00e9chargement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4868"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4868\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4869,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4868\/revisions\/4869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}