{"id":4900,"date":"1984-06-18T08:34:30","date_gmt":"1984-06-18T07:34:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4900"},"modified":"2016-08-24T08:35:10","modified_gmt":"2016-08-24T07:35:10","slug":"sentence-537","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1984\/06\/18\/sentence-537\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 537"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 537 – Synacomex, ma\u00efs en vrac – attente sur rade – surestaries – incendie – accord au 1er degr\u00e9 – autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e – encombrement du port – once on demurrage always on demurrage – demande reconventionnelle pour avaries et manquants – objet diff\u00e9rent de la demande initiale – demande prescrite. <\/strong>C\/P Synacomex – (I) Demande en paiement de surestaries – Congestion portuaire \u00e0 destination – Incendie du navire pendant son attente sur rade et alors qu’il \u00e9tait en surestaries – Application de la r\u00e8gle \u00ab\u00a0une fois en surestaries, toujours en surestaries\u00a0\u00bb d\u00e8s lors que l’affr\u00e9teur ne prouve pas qu’en l’absence d’incendie le navire aurait pu accoster plus t\u00f4t. (II) Demande dite \u00ab\u00a0reconventionnelle\u00a0\u00bb de l’affr\u00e9teur pour des avaries et manquants irrecevable et au surplus prescrite.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 537 – Synacomex, ma\u00efs en vrac – attente sur rade – surestaries – incendie – accord au 1er degr\u00e9 – autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e – encombrement du port – once on demurrage always on demurrage – demande reconventionnelle pour avaries et manquants – objet diff\u00e9rent de la demande initiale – demande prescrite. C\/P<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4900"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4900\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4901,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4900\/revisions\/4901"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}