{"id":4920,"date":"1984-02-08T09:07:56","date_gmt":"1984-02-08T08:07:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=4920"},"modified":"2016-08-24T09:08:29","modified_gmt":"2016-08-24T08:08:29","slug":"sentence-526","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1984\/02\/08\/sentence-526\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 526"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 526 &#8211; Gencon &#8211; loi applicable \u00e0 la prescription &#8211; loi du for &#8211; <\/strong>C\/P Gencon. Litige sur liquidation d&rsquo;un compte de surestaries &#8211; Prescription extinctive &#8211; Application de la loi du pavillon (non) &#8211; Loi du for (oui). &#8211; la d\u00e9signation des arbitres ne suffit pas pour interrompre la prescription.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 526 &#8211; Gencon &#8211; loi applicable \u00e0 la prescription &#8211; loi du for &#8211; C\/P Gencon. Litige sur liquidation d&rsquo;un compte de surestaries &#8211; Prescription extinctive &#8211; Application de la loi du pavillon (non) &#8211; Loi du for (oui). &#8211; la d\u00e9signation des arbitres ne suffit pas pour interrompre la prescription.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4920","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4920","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4920"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4920\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4921,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4920\/revisions\/4921"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4920"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4920"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4920"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}