{"id":5030,"date":"1983-01-19T14:11:22","date_gmt":"1983-01-19T13:11:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=5030"},"modified":"2016-08-25T14:11:59","modified_gmt":"2016-08-25T13:11:59","slug":"sentence-475","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1983\/01\/19\/sentence-475\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 475"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 475 – Synacomex – ma\u00efs en vrac – manquants – paiement du fret sur poids embarqu\u00e9 – aucune preuve du tonnage livr\u00e9 par navire – lien clause – demande reconventionnelle concernant manquants ind\u00e9pendante de la demande principale – prescription demande reconventionnelle. <\/strong>C\/P au voyage Synacomex – Demande principale de l’armateur portant sur le calcul du fret et le paiement de surestaries – Demande reconventionnelle de l’affr\u00e9teur portant sur un manquant constat\u00e9 par lui au d\u00e9chargement – Demande principale accueillie quant au montant du fret, mais rejet\u00e9e quant aux surestaries, faute par l’armateur d’avoir exerc\u00e9 son \u00ab\u00a0lien\u00a0\u00bb sur la cargaison – Demande reconventionnelle de l’affr\u00e9teur d\u00e9clar\u00e9e prescrite, comme non exerc\u00e9e dans le d\u00e9lai de 6 mois apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9chargement pr\u00e9vu par la charte.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 475 – Synacomex – ma\u00efs en vrac – manquants – paiement du fret sur poids embarqu\u00e9 – aucune preuve du tonnage livr\u00e9 par navire – lien clause – demande reconventionnelle concernant manquants ind\u00e9pendante de la demande principale – prescription demande reconventionnelle. C\/P au voyage Synacomex – Demande principale de l’armateur portant sur le calcul<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5030","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5030"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5030\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5031,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5030\/revisions\/5031"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5030"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}