{"id":5036,"date":"1982-12-28T08:19:21","date_gmt":"1982-12-28T07:19:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=5036"},"modified":"2016-08-26T08:19:57","modified_gmt":"2016-08-26T07:19:57","slug":"sentence-472","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1982\/12\/28\/sentence-472\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 472"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sentence 472 – Construction navale – avarie \u00e0 moto-compresseur d’air – vice propre et cach\u00e9 – demande en garantie – responsabilit\u00e9 du constructeur (oui) – Pr\u00e9judice. <\/strong>Construction navale – expertise judiciaire – affr\u00e9teur coque nue appelle propri\u00e9taire \u00e0 l’arbitrage – propri\u00e9taire appel\u00e9 constructeur en garantie – fr\u00e9teur coque nue responsable envers l’affr\u00e9teur des cons\u00e9quences dommageables de l’avarie – armateur fond\u00e9 \u00e0 invoquer vice cach\u00e9 envers constructeur et demander garantie de sa condamnation envers affr\u00e9teur.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sentence 472 – Construction navale – avarie \u00e0 moto-compresseur d’air – vice propre et cach\u00e9 – demande en garantie – responsabilit\u00e9 du constructeur (oui) – Pr\u00e9judice. Construction navale – expertise judiciaire – affr\u00e9teur coque nue appelle propri\u00e9taire \u00e0 l’arbitrage – propri\u00e9taire appel\u00e9 constructeur en garantie – fr\u00e9teur coque nue responsable envers l’affr\u00e9teur des cons\u00e9quences dommageables<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5036"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5036\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5037,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5036\/revisions\/5037"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}