{"id":5038,"date":"1982-12-28T08:21:47","date_gmt":"1982-12-28T07:21:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=5038"},"modified":"2016-08-26T08:22:29","modified_gmt":"2016-08-26T07:22:29","slug":"sentence-471","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1982\/12\/28\/sentence-471\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 471"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 471 \u2013 Construction navale &#8211; voir sentence N\u00b0472 &#8211; pr\u00e9judice affr\u00e9teur coque nue envers fr\u00e9teur suite vice propre et cach\u00e9. <\/strong>Construction navale &#8211; Navire fr\u00e9t\u00e9 coque-nue d\u00e8s sa livraison \u2013 Arrachage accidentel du volant d&rsquo;un moto-compresseur, au cours d&rsquo;une travers\u00e9e &#8211; Recours indemnitaire de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur coque-nue, pour les dommages en r\u00e9sultant, contre son fr\u00e9teur et de ce dernier contre le chantier naval &#8211; Jonction des deux proc\u00e9dures connexes par sentence avant dire droit, \u00e9tant entendu que chaque affaire donnerait lieu \u00e0 sentence distincte par les arbitres d\u00e9sign\u00e9s pour en conna\u00eetre &#8211; Demande principale contre le fr\u00e9teur accueillie pour sa quasi-totalit\u00e9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 471 \u2013 Construction navale &#8211; voir sentence N\u00b0472 &#8211; pr\u00e9judice affr\u00e9teur coque nue envers fr\u00e9teur suite vice propre et cach\u00e9. Construction navale &#8211; Navire fr\u00e9t\u00e9 coque-nue d\u00e8s sa livraison \u2013 Arrachage accidentel du volant d&rsquo;un moto-compresseur, au cours d&rsquo;une travers\u00e9e &#8211; Recours indemnitaire de l&rsquo;affr\u00e9teur coque-nue, pour les dommages en r\u00e9sultant, contre son fr\u00e9teur<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5038"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5038\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5039,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5038\/revisions\/5039"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}