{"id":5066,"date":"1982-11-12T12:49:12","date_gmt":"1982-11-12T11:49:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=5066"},"modified":"2016-08-29T12:49:52","modified_gmt":"2016-08-29T11:49:52","slug":"sentence-459","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/1982\/11\/12\/sentence-459\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 459"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 459 &#8211; Construction navale &#8211; avarie de treuils de bigues &#8211; appel en garantie contre le fournisseur &#8211; validit\u00e9 de la saisine de la Chambre &#8211; arbitres fond\u00e9s \u00e0 statuer sur leur propre comp\u00e9tence &#8211; clause compromissoire non \u00e9crite &#8211; incomp\u00e9tence de la Chambre. <\/strong>Construction navale &#8211; Action en garantie exerc\u00e9e par le Chantier naval, ma\u00eetre d&rsquo;oeuvre, contre un sous-traitant &#8211; Comp\u00e9tence de la Chambre Arbitrale Maritime de Paris contest\u00e9e par ce dernier.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 459 &#8211; Construction navale &#8211; avarie de treuils de bigues &#8211; appel en garantie contre le fournisseur &#8211; validit\u00e9 de la saisine de la Chambre &#8211; arbitres fond\u00e9s \u00e0 statuer sur leur propre comp\u00e9tence &#8211; clause compromissoire non \u00e9crite &#8211; incomp\u00e9tence de la Chambre. Construction navale &#8211; Action en garantie exerc\u00e9e par le Chantier<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5066"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5066\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5067,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5066\/revisions\/5067"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}