{"id":5962,"date":"2017-09-26T12:30:31","date_gmt":"2017-09-26T11:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=5962"},"modified":"2018-04-18T14:37:17","modified_gmt":"2018-04-18T13:37:17","slug":"sentence-1234","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2017\/09\/26\/sentence-1234\/","title":{"rendered":"SENTENCE 1234"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1234 (second degr\u00e9) \u2013 C\/P Mediterranean Iron Ore \u2013 \u00c9chouement hors du chenal du\u00a0<\/strong><strong>port de chargement \u2013 Faute nautique \u2013 Application des r\u00e8gles de La Haye\u2013Visby &#8211; Exon\u00e9ration\u00a0<\/strong><strong>de l\u2019armateur \u2013 Restitution de la contribution des assureurs facult\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019avarie commune (non).\u00a0<\/strong>Un vraquier s\u2019\u00e9tait \u00e9chou\u00e9 avec pilote \u00e0 bord en faisant route du terminal de chargement vers la\u00a0haute mer. Une partie de la cargaison ayant d\u00fb \u00eatre d\u00e9charg\u00e9e sur all\u00e8ge pour lib\u00e9rer le navire,\u00a0un litige s\u2019est \u00e9lev\u00e9 entre les armateurs et les assureurs facult\u00e9s, ceux-ci soutenant que\u00a0l\u2019\u00e9chouement \u00e9tait d\u00fb \u00e0 un chargement excessif du navire en violation de la charte-partie et de\u00a0r\u00e8gles imp\u00e9ratives et demandant que leur contribution \u00e0 l\u2019avarie commune leur soit restitu\u00e9e.\u00a0Se fondant sur certaines donn\u00e9es, notamment GPS, le Tribunal arbitral a constat\u00e9 que le navire\u00a0s\u2019\u00e9tait \u00e9chou\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019ext\u00e9rieur du chenal en raison d\u2019une faute de navigation commise sous\u00a0l\u2019influence du pilote sans que les violations all\u00e9gu\u00e9es du code ISM et de la convention SOLAS,\u00a0\u00e0 supposer \u00e9tablies, aient eu un r\u00f4le causal dans l\u2019\u00e9v\u00e8nement.\u00a0Les r\u00e8gles de La Haye Visby, incorpor\u00e9es dans la C\/P au voyage par r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 la General\u00a0Paramount clause, \u00e9tant applicables, le moyen tir\u00e9 de la faute nautique qui exon\u00e8re les\u00a0armateurs de leur responsabilit\u00e9 est d\u00e8s lors fond\u00e9 et la demande de restitution de la\u00a0contribution \u00e0 l\u2019avarie commune des assureurs a donc \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9e.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1234 (second degr\u00e9) \u2013 C\/P Mediterranean Iron Ore \u2013 \u00c9chouement hors du chenal du\u00a0port de chargement \u2013 Faute nautique \u2013 Application des r\u00e8gles de La Haye\u2013Visby &#8211; Exon\u00e9ration\u00a0de l\u2019armateur \u2013 Restitution de la contribution des assureurs facult\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019avarie commune (non).\u00a0Un vraquier s\u2019\u00e9tait \u00e9chou\u00e9 avec pilote \u00e0 bord en faisant route du terminal de<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5962","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5962"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5962\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5963,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5962\/revisions\/5963"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}