Award 1237 – C\/P Synacomex 90 \u2013 Wheat flour in bags \u2013 Dispute about handling expenses into a tween decker \u2013 Claimant withdrawal \u2013 Defendant counter-claim partially granted.<\/b><\/p>\n
A tween decker was chartered for the transport of wheat flour in bags. In the C\/P, the Shipowner confirmed that the vessel holds were \u201cfully box\u201d and did not contain any obstacles.
\nAt first, the Shipowner required the payment of demurrage in view of the operations slowness and then withdrew his claim. For his part, the Charterer claimed back the refunding of additional costs caused by the vessel non conformity with the C\/P.<\/p>\n
The arbitrators could only record the Shipowner\u2019s claim withdrawal. As for the Charterer\u2019s claim, photos showed that the holds included wings contrary to the vessel description. However they only granted to the Charterer part of his claim whose amount did not appear to them totally convincing and left the Shipowner to bear two thirds of arbitration costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Award 1237 – C\/P Synacomex 90 \u2013 Wheat flour in bags \u2013 Dispute about handling expenses into a tween decker \u2013 Claimant withdrawal \u2013 Defendant counter-claim partially granted. A tween decker was chartered for the transport of wheat flour in bags. In the C\/P, the Shipowner confirmed that the vessel holds were \u201cfully box\u201d and<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5993"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5993\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5995,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5993\/revisions\/5995"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}