{"id":2165,"date":"2010-01-29T08:55:04","date_gmt":"2010-01-29T07:55:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/?p=2165"},"modified":"2016-05-25T13:39:16","modified_gmt":"2016-05-25T12:39:16","slug":"sentence-15","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/2010\/01\/29\/sentence-15\/","title":{"rendered":"Sentence 1171"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Sentence 1171\u00a0\u2013 Contrat de construction d\u2019un thonier \u2013 appel en garantie. <\/strong>Parmi les d\u00e9sordres constat\u00e9s apr\u00e8s livraison par expert judiciaire, la garantie contractuelle pour pr\u00e9tendus d\u00e9faut de lignage n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 retenue car la proc\u00e9dure de sa mise en \u0153uvre n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9e\u00a0; en revanche la d\u00e9t\u00e9rioration du rev\u00eatement des cuves \u00e0 poissons constat\u00e9e contradictoirement a \u00e9t\u00e9 imput\u00e9e au chantier dans le cadre de la garantie.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sentence 1171\u00a0\u2013 Contrat de construction d\u2019un thonier \u2013 appel en garantie. Parmi les d\u00e9sordres constat\u00e9s apr\u00e8s livraison par expert judiciaire, la garantie contractuelle pour pr\u00e9tendus d\u00e9faut de lignage n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 retenue car la proc\u00e9dure de sa mise en \u0153uvre n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9e\u00a0; en revanche la d\u00e9t\u00e9rioration du rev\u00eatement des cuves \u00e0 poissons constat\u00e9e<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe-fr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2165"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2165\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2341,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2165\/revisions\/2341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.arbitrage-maritime.org\/CAMP-V3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}